Zyprexa Lawsuits: Lilly Agrees to Settle Most Claims

by Mario Lozano on January 5, 2007

in Zyprexa

Eli Lilly and Co. said on Thursday it has agreed to pay up to $500 million to settle 18,000 Zyprexa lawsuits alleging it had failed to adequately warn patients that Zyprexa may increase the risk of diabetes.

“While we remain confident that these claims are without merit, we took this difficult step because we believe it is in the best interest of the company, the patients who depend on this medication, and their physicians,” said Sidney Taurel, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Eli Lilly and Company. “We wanted to reduce significant uncertainties involved in litigating such complex cases. Our decision to resolve the claims does not change the fact that Zyprexa has and will continue to improve the lives of millions of patients around the world who are suffering from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. These settlement agreements will enable Lilly to focus first and foremost on addressing unmet medical needs through research, educational programs and partnerships with doctors and patients.”

In June 2005, Lilly agreed to pay about $700 million to settle 8,000 Zyprexa lawsuits in the United States.

The majority of the of the Zyprexa lawsuits claim that before September 2003, the package insert warning about the potential link between Zyprexa and hyperglycemia and diabetes was not adequately displayed.

In September 2003, the Food and Drug Administration required label changes for Zyprexa and all atypical antipsychotics, adding more information warning about a possible link with diabetes.

In 2004, a panel of the American Diabetes Association found that Zyprexa caused diabetes more than other widely used antipsychotic drugs, in part becuase it has a tendency to cause more higher weight gain. However, the FDA has never made a similar finding.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Legal News Watch: Top 10 Stories of 2006

by Mario Lozano on December 31, 2006

in Legal News Watch

Which events in 2006 had the greatest impact on your legal rights? Below are our nominations for the top 10 stories of 2006:

Now it is your turn to vote them up or down as you feel. You are welcomed to add your own to the dynamic list, which is on the Legal News Watch Squidoo. We used the new Plexo feature to do this.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Just in time for New Years…

by Mario Lozano on December 28, 2006

in Legal News Watch

Legal News Watch is back and just in time for 2007.

We are finally using WordPress to bring you the Stories That Impact Your Rights. We are happy to report that all the old content, including your comments, were successfully migrated to the new system. You can expect to see a fresh batch of news very soon.

We would like to wish everyone a very

Happy New Years.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Pargluva, a proposed diabetes drug from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck & Company, appears to increase the risk of death, heart attack or stroke, according to a study published in a leading medical journal last week.

The study was conducted by the two Cleveland Clinic cardiologists who warned in 2001 about the cardiovascular risks associated with Vioxx, which was pulled from the market last year. They used the data, from the company-funded clinical trials, that was submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.

Their analysis found 1.47 percent of the diabetic patients who took Pargluva during clinical trials died, suffered a heart attack or stroke-more than double the rate among those taking a placebo or an already approved rival drug sold as Actos.

James Brophy of McGill University in Montreal wrote an accompanying editorial for the study that was also published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, where he questions the “methodological decisions in the sponsor’s FDA application” that may foster an illusion of safety for Pargluva. He also included a list of 8 methods observed in the application that in his opinion may have contributed to an overestimate of the safety profile.

(via The Journal of the American Medical Association)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

iPod Nano Lawsuit Filed Against Apple

October 26, 2005

Jason Tomczak, an iPod Nano owner, has filed a lawsuit against Apple Computers, Inc. alleging the company launched the digital music player despite knowing that it was defective.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in San Jose, California, claims that the iPod Nano scratches “excessively during normal usage,” rendering the screen on it unreadable, [...]

Read the full article →

EA Agrees to Pay $15.6 Million to Settle Class Action on Overtime

October 17, 2005

Electronic Arts has agreed to pay $15.6 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by computer graphic artists seeking overtime compensation, the company announced on Oct. 5, 2005. The class includes computer graphic artists, including “animators,” “modelers,” “Texture artists,” “lighters,” “background effects artists,” “special effects artists” and “environmental artists,” who worked at EA’s California [...]

Read the full article →

Paxil May Increase Risk of Birth Defects

October 4, 2005

Paxil, an antidepressant drug, may increase the risk of birth defects for pregnant women taking it during the first trimester, the Food and Drug Administration warned last week.
The warning comes after Paxil manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline sent the FDA and doctors a letter about preliminary results from a study suggest an increase in the risk of congenital [...]

Read the full article →

Strattera Linked to Suicidal Thinking in Children

October 4, 2005

Strattera, an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder drug, may increase suicidal thinking in children and adolescents, the Food and Drug Administration warned on Thursday.
“Children and adolescents being treated with Strattera should be closely monitored for clinical worsening, as well as agitation, irritability, suicidal thinking or behaviors, and unusual changes in behavior, especially during the initial few [...]

Read the full article →

Class Action Filed Against Pfizer Over Marketing of Lipitor

September 28, 2005

A nationwide class action lawsuit was filed today against Pfizer Inc., alleging the world’s largest drug company devised a promotional scheme to boost sales of its anti-cholesterol drug Lipitor by misleading women and seniors about the link between the drug and heart disease.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Boston, alleges that Pfizer [...]

Read the full article →

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Palm Over Treo 600 & Treo 650

September 25, 2005

Three California consumers filed a class action lawsuit last week against Palm, Inc., accusing the company of selling defective Treo 600 and Treo 650 smartphones.
The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, alleges that both devices suffer from numerous inherent defects that impair its functionality. These alleged problems [...]

Read the full article →