<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Not Call Rule Begins Today, $11,000 Fine per Violation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalnewswatch.com/272/do-not-call-rule-begins-today-11000-fine-per-violation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalnewswatch.com/272/do-not-call-rule-begins-today-11000-fine-per-violation</link>
	<description>Stories That Impact Your Rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dottie</title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewswatch.com/272/do-not-call-rule-begins-today-11000-fine-per-violation/comment-page-1#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dottie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalnewswatch.com/?p=272#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>So how do we report violations of &quot;do not call&quot; faxes and/or calls
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how do we report violations of &#8220;do not call&#8221; faxes and/or calls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewswatch.com/272/do-not-call-rule-begins-today-11000-fine-per-violation/comment-page-1#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalnewswatch.com/?p=272#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>So stacey, just where in the constitution is making telephone calls protected? Would that be freedom of speech?

While companies have some right to use communication media, it is not without restriction. When was the last time you saw a cigarette ad on TV?

Also, my right to privacy and freedom from being bombarded by telephone calls trumps the free speech of any company making calls.

We were getting upwards of 15 calls a day. Mow, BLISS! No jumping up during dinner to answer the telephone. 

Tell ya what there skippy . . . you can field all of those calls for me . . . Ummmm K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So stacey, just where in the constitution is making telephone calls protected? Would that be freedom of speech?</p>
<p>While companies have some right to use communication media, it is not without restriction. When was the last time you saw a cigarette ad on TV?</p>
<p>Also, my right to privacy and freedom from being bombarded by telephone calls trumps the free speech of any company making calls.</p>
<p>We were getting upwards of 15 calls a day. Mow, BLISS! No jumping up during dinner to answer the telephone. </p>
<p>Tell ya what there skippy . . . you can field all of those calls for me . . . Ummmm K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacey</title>
		<link>http://www.legalnewswatch.com/272/do-not-call-rule-begins-today-11000-fine-per-violation/comment-page-1#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalnewswatch.com/?p=272#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Personally i think this is unconstitutional.  Phoneo numbers are public knowledge and if a person wants their number private, then they should pay for the service.  One is able to hang the phone up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i think this is unconstitutional.  Phoneo numbers are public knowledge and if a person wants their number private, then they should pay for the service.  One is able to hang the phone up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
